People · Performance Management

Reviews with the receipts attached.

An assessment sitting beside the delivery record it's about.

Assessment

Cycle and period
Reviewer and reviewee
Ratings against criteria
Written assessment
Outcome

Drawn from

Projects delivered

What they owned and what stage it reached

Time logged

Billable and non-billable, against plan

Milestones met

Delivered on time, late, or still open

Attendance

Where the organization tracks it

Conducting a review and administering the cycle are separate permissions.

How cycle runs. 

  1. 01The cycle is opened for a period, with who reviews whom already known from the org structure.
  2. 02Reviewers complete assessments with the employee's delivery record open beside them.
  3. 03The employee sees their own assessment — not a summary of it.
  4. 04It stays on the record, so the next cycle starts from what was actually said last time.

Why this sits on the same data

Performance conversations go badly when the facts are in dispute. If the hours, the milestones, and the projects all come from the system both people already use, the conversation can be about the work instead of about the numbers.

Next

Where this connects. 

See Performance Management on your own work. 

We'll run a live project of yours through it rather than showing a demo tenant.

Request a demo