People · Performance Management
Reviews with the receipts attached.
An assessment sitting beside the delivery record it's about.
Assessment
Cycle and period
Reviewer and reviewee
Ratings against criteria
Written assessment
Outcome
Drawn from
Projects delivered
What they owned and what stage it reached
Time logged
Billable and non-billable, against plan
Milestones met
Delivered on time, late, or still open
Attendance
Where the organization tracks it
Conducting a review and administering the cycle are separate permissions.
Current capabilities
What you can do in Performance Management
Performance assessments that sit next to the same project and time data your team is already producing, instead of a disconnected annual-review tool nobody opens the rest of the year.
- Assessment cycles with reviewer workflow
- Department performance views for delivery leads
- Individual performance pages tied to real project involvement
How a cycle runs.
- 01The cycle is opened for a period, with who reviews whom already known from the org structure.
- 02Reviewers complete assessments with the employee's delivery record open beside them.
- 03The employee sees their own assessment — not a summary of it.
- 04It stays on the record, so the next cycle starts from what was actually said last time.
Why this sits on the same data
Performance conversations go badly when the facts are in dispute. If the hours, the milestones, and the projects all come from the system both people already use, the conversation can be about the work instead of about the numbers.
Next
Where this connects.
See Performance Management on your own work.
We'll run a live project of yours through it rather than showing a demo tenant.
Request a demo